How to Achieve and Maintain FedRAMP Compliance

Lahav Ezer, Product Manager

February 2, 2025

5 min read

The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) was established in 2011 to create a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Before FedRAMP, government agencies conducted their own security assessments when adopting cloud technologies, leading to inefficiencies, redundant efforts, and inconsistent security measures across different departments. The introduction of FedRAMP streamlined this process by providing a single, unified framework for evaluating cloud service providers (CSPs).

FedRAMP was developed in response to increasing cybersecurity threats and the rapid adoption of cloud-based services. The federal government needed a way to ensure that CSPs adhered to strict security standards to protect sensitive government data while allowing agencies to leverage the benefits of cloud computing. By aligning with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-53, FedRAMP requires CSPs to implement and maintain rigorous security measures to safeguard federal information.

Achieving FedRAMP compliance is a complex and resource-intensive process that involves thorough security assessments, independent audits, and continuous monitoring. However, certification offers significant advantages, including access to federal contracts, a strengthened security posture, and increased trust from both government and private-sector clients.

This guide provides an in-depth look at FedRAMP compliance, covering its requirements, certification levels, the vulnerability remediation process, and how organizations can successfully navigate the authorization process.

What is FedRAMP Compliance?

FedRAMP is a government-wide program designed to standardize security assessments, authorizations, and continuous monitoring for cloud services that store, process, or transmit federal data. It provides a structured framework that ensures CSPs implement strong security controls to protect sensitive government information while streamlining the procurement process for federal agencies.

FedRAMP compliance is built on NIST Special Publication 800-53, which outlines security and privacy controls for federal information systems. Cloud providers seeking authorization must demonstrate adherence to these security controls, undergo an independent third-party assessment, and commit to continuous monitoring and security improvements.

One of the main advantages of FedRAMP is its centralized authorization process. Instead of requiring each federal agency to conduct its own security assessment for every cloud provider, FedRAMP enables CSPs to obtain a single authorization that can be reused across multiple agencies. This significantly reduces costs, minimizes redundant security evaluations, and accelerates the adoption of secure cloud technologies.

The Importance of FedRAMP in Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, and cloud environments are frequently targeted by attackers seeking to exploit vulnerabilities and gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. FedRAMP plays a crucial role in strengthening cloud security for government agencies by enforcing standardized security measures that CSPs must follow.

One of the core principles of FedRAMP is continuous monitoring, which requires CSPs to conduct regular security assessments, vulnerability scans, and risk management activities. Unlike traditional security certifications that provide a one-time compliance check, FedRAMP mandates ongoing security oversight to ensure CSPs maintain a strong cybersecurity posture.

FedRAMP also aligns with NIST’s Risk Management Framework, providing a structured approach for identifying, assessing, and mitigating security risks. By implementing robust security controls, CSPs reduce the likelihood of data breaches, unauthorized access, and other cybersecurity incidents.

For federal agencies, FedRAMP provides a streamlined process for evaluating cloud security, allowing them to adopt new technologies more efficiently without compromising security. Instead of performing separate security assessments for each provider, agencies can rely on FedRAMP’s standardized evaluation process to select pre-approved cloud solutions.

FedRAMP Certification Levels

FedRAMP categorizes cloud services into three security impact levels based on the sensitivity of the data they handle. These impact levels are defined by the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 199.

Low Impact Authorization

Low impact systems process publicly available or minimally sensitive data. A security breach in these environments would have little to no impact on government operations. These systems typically require fewer security controls compared to higher impact levels and are used for non-sensitive applications, such as general websites or public data repositories.

Moderate Impact Authorization

Moderate impact systems handle sensitive but unclassified government data, including financial records, personally identifiable information (PII), and mission-critical agency data. A security breach in a moderate impact system could result in significant harm to government operations, individuals, or agency assets. These systems require over 300 security controls to ensure data confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

High Impact Authorization

High impact systems process highly sensitive government data, including law enforcement records, emergency response information, and national security data. A security breach in a high-impact system could have catastrophic consequences for government agencies. These environments require over 400 security controls and the strictest encryption, identity management, and access control measures.

The Requirements for FedRAMP Compliance

Achieving FedRAMP compliance requires cloud service providers (CSPs) to meet rigorous security, risk management, and monitoring requirements. The process is designed to ensure that cloud services used by federal agencies maintain a high standard of cybersecurity, protecting sensitive government data from unauthorized access, breaches, and cyber threats. The requirements are extensive, covering a wide range of security controls, documentation, and continuous monitoring activities.

Cloud providers seeking FedRAMP authorization must follow a structured process that includes selecting an authorization path, implementing security controls, undergoing an independent security assessment, and maintaining compliance through continuous monitoring. These requirements are based on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-53, which outlines security and privacy controls for federal information systems.

1. Selecting an Authorization Path

CSPs can obtain FedRAMP authorization through two primary paths:

Agency Authorization: In this path, a specific federal agency sponsors the CSP and guides them through the compliance process. The agency works closely with the CSP to review security documentation, conduct assessments, and approve the system for use within that agency. This approach is ideal for CSPs that already have a government client interested in their services.
Joint Authorization Board (JAB) Authorization: The JAB, which includes representatives from the Department of Defense (DoD), the General Services Administration (GSA), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), reviews and grants authorization for widely used cloud services. The JAB authorization process is more rigorous and selective, as it is intended for CSPs whose services are expected to be used by multiple federal agencies.

2. Implementing FedRAMP Security ControlsSecurity is at the core of FedRAMP compliance. CSPs must implement over 300 security controls for moderate-impact systems and over 400 controls for high-impact systems. These controls align with NIST SP 800-53 and cover a wide range of security domains, including:

Access Control (AC): CSPs must enforce strict access controls to ensure that only authorized users can access sensitive systems and data. This includes multi-factor authentication (MFA), least privilege access, and session management policies.
Audit and Accountability (AU): CSPs must log all user activities and system events, ensuring that they have a complete audit trail that can be reviewed for security incidents. Logs must be protected from tampering and stored for a predefined period.
Configuration Management (CM): Systems must be configured securely according to government standards. Any configuration changes must be documented, reviewed, and tested to prevent security misconfigurations.
Data Encryption (SC): Sensitive data must be encrypted both at rest and in transit using FIPS 140-2 or FIPS 140-3 validated cryptographic modules. Encryption helps protect government data from unauthorized access and cyberattacks.
Incident Response (IR): CSPs must establish a comprehensive incident response plan that includes detecting, reporting, analyzing, and responding to security incidents. This plan must be tested regularly to ensure effectiveness.
Continuous Monitoring (CM): Ongoing security monitoring is required to detect vulnerabilities and threats in real-time. CSPs must use automated tools to conduct regular security scans, identify security weaknesses, and address risks as they arise.

3. Developing and Submitting Security DocumentationFedRAMP requires CSPs to create and submit extensive documentation that outlines their security policies, procedures, and risk management strategies. Key documents include:

System Security Plan (SSP): This comprehensive document describes the system’s architecture, security controls, and risk management strategy. It provides federal agencies with a detailed overview of how the CSP protects government data.
Security Assessment Plan (SAP): This plan outlines the security testing approach and methodologies that will be used during the independent assessment.
Security Assessment Report (SAR): Prepared by a Third-Party Assessment Organization (3PAO), this document summarizes the results of the independent security assessment, identifying security strengths and areas that need improvement.
Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M): This document details any security vulnerabilities identified during the assessment and outlines the CSP’s plan to remediate them within specified timelines.

4. Undergoing an Independent Security AssessmentBefore achieving FedRAMP authorization, CSPs must undergo an independent assessment conducted by a FedRAMP-accredited Third-Party Assessment Organization (3PAO). The 3PAO performs a comprehensive security evaluation that includes:

Reviewing the CSP’s security documentation
Conducting penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities
Evaluating the effectiveness of implemented security controls
Providing a detailed assessment report to the sponsoring agency or JAB

The assessment results determine whether the CSP is granted an Authority to Operate (ATO) by an agency or a Provisional Authority to Operate (P-ATO) from the JAB.5. Maintaining Compliance Through Continuous MonitoringFedRAMP compliance does not end with certification. CSPs must continuously monitor their environments to maintain authorization. This includes:

Conducting monthly vulnerability scans and submitting reports to the authorizing agency
Performing annual security assessments to evaluate system security effectiveness
Implementing software patches and security updates in a timely manner
Addressing new vulnerabilities and updating security documentation as needed

Failure to maintain continuous monitoring can result in suspension or revocation of FedRAMP authorization, preventing the CSP from providing services to federal agencies.The FedRAMP Vulnerability Remediation TimelineFedRAMP enforces strict deadlines for addressing security vulnerabilities to ensure that CSPs maintain a high level of cybersecurity. Vulnerabilities are categorized based on severity, and each category has a defined remediation timeline:

Critical vulnerabilities (e.g., zero-day exploits, unauthorized access flaws): Must be remediated within 30 days.
High-severity vulnerabilities (e.g., encryption weaknesses, misconfigurations that could lead to breaches): Must be resolved within 90 days.
Moderate-severity vulnerabilities (e.g., outdated software with known but less severe vulnerabilities): Must be addressed as part of the CSP’s continuous monitoring plan.
Low-severity vulnerabilities (e.g., minor security misconfigurations): Require monitoring but do not have strict deadlines.

To comply with these timelines, CSPs must establish a robust vulnerability management process that includes:

Automated vulnerability scanning to identify security weaknesses in real-time
Patch management procedures to ensure timely software updates and security fixes
Incident response workflows to quickly address and mitigate threats

CSPs must document their remediation efforts in the Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) and submit regular reports to the authorizing agency or JAB. Failure to meet remediation deadlines can result in a compliance violation, potentially leading to the loss of FedRAMP authorization.

FedRAMP Compliance Checklist

Achieving FedRAMP compliance requires a structured approach that includes security implementation, assessments, and continuous monitoring. Use this checklist to ensure your organization is following the necessary steps to obtain and maintain FedRAMP authorization.

1. Determine Your FedRAMP Authorization Path

☐ Identify whether your organization will pursue:

Agency Authorization (sponsorship by a federal agency)
Joint Authorization Board (JAB) Authorization (review by DoD, GSA, and DHS)

☐ Assess which FedRAMP impact level applies to your cloud service:

Low Impact (minimal-sensitive data)
Moderate Impact (sensitive but unclassified data)
High Impact (highly sensitive government data)

☐ Conduct a readiness assessment to determine if your cloud environment meets baseline security requirements.

2. Implement FedRAMP Security Controls

☐ Review and implement security controls based on NIST SP 800-53 standards.

☐ Establish strict access controls (multi-factor authentication, least privilege access).

☐ Encrypt all data at rest and in transit using FIPS 140-2 or FIPS 140-3 validated cryptographic modules.

☐ Configure audit logging and monitoring to track system activities.

☐ Implement vulnerability scanning and patch management procedures.

☐ Develop and document an incident response plan and test it regularly.

☐ Establish continuous monitoring protocols for ongoing security assessment.

3. Prepare Required Documentation

☐ Develop a System Security Plan (SSP) outlining your security controls and system architecture.

☐ Create a Security Assessment Plan (SAP) to document testing and validation procedures.

☐ Prepare a Security Assessment Report (SAR) based on findings from independent testing.

☐ Develop a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) to track and address identified vulnerabilities.

☐ Maintain and submit continuous monitoring reports to the authorizing agency.

4. Work with a FedRAMP-Accredited Third-Party Assessment Organization (3PAO)

☐ Engage a 3PAO to conduct an independent security assessment.

☐ Undergo penetration testing and vulnerability assessments to identify security gaps.

☐ Review and remediate findings documented in the 3PAO Security Assessment Report.

☐ Submit security documentation for final review by the authorizing agency or JAB.

5. Obtain FedRAMP Authorization

☐ Receive an Authority to Operate (ATO) from a sponsoring agency or a Provisional Authority to Operate (P-ATO) from the JAB.

☐ Ensure all security controls are fully operational before onboarding federal clients.

☐ Establish an ongoing compliance team responsible for maintaining FedRAMP authorization.

6. Maintain Continuous Monitoring and Compliance

☐ Perform monthly vulnerability scans and submit reports to the authorizing agency.

☐ Conduct annual security assessments and reauthorization reviews.

☐ Continuously update security policies, incident response plans, and risk assessments.

☐ Address security vulnerabilities within the required FedRAMP remediation timelines:

Critical vulnerabilities (remediate within 30 days)
High-severity vulnerabilities (remediate within 90 days)
Moderate/Low-severity vulnerabilities (track and remediate in ongoing monitoring)

☐ Stay informed about FedRAMP updates and evolving security requirements.

FAQs

What does FedRAMP stand for?

‍FedRAMP stands for the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program. It is a government-wide initiative designed to standardize the security assessment and authorization process for cloud service providers working with federal agencies.

How long does it take to get FedRAMP certified?

‍The time it takes to complete the FedRAMP certification process varies depending on the complexity of the cloud system and the chosen authorization path. On average, it takes between 6 months and 2 years to achieve full authorization. Organizations pursuing the Joint Authorization Board (JAB) path typically experience longer timelines, while those seeking agency sponsorship may achieve authorization more quickly.

Is FedRAMP mandatory for all cloud service providers?

‍FedRAMP is mandatory for any cloud service provider (CSP) that wants to provide cloud solutions to federal agencies. Private-sector organizations are not required to comply with FedRAMP but may choose to adopt its security standards to improve their cybersecurity posture.

What is the difference between FedRAMP and FISMA compliance?

‍FedRAMP and FISMA (Federal Information Security Modernization Act) both focus on securing federal information systems, but they differ in scope:

FedRAMP applies specifically to cloud service providers that offer cloud-based solutions to federal agencies.
FISMA applies to all federal information systems, including both cloud and on-premises environments.

FedRAMP builds upon FISMA requirements by introducing additional cloud-specific security controls and a centralized authorization process.

How Opus Helps with FedRAMP Compliance

‍Opus provides cloud security solutions that simplify and accelerate the FedRAMP compliance process. By leveraging automation, real-time monitoring, and expert advisory services, Opus helps organizations efficiently meet FedRAMP’s stringent security requirements.

‍Automated Compliance Monitoring: Opus offers an integrated compliance platform that continuously monitors cloud environments, detects security risks, and ensures that security controls remain in place. By automating compliance tracking, Opus reduces the manual workload associated with FedRAMP audits.

‍Security Assessments and Risk Management: Opus conducts comprehensive security assessments and risk analyses to help CSPs identify gaps in their security posture. The platform provides actionable insights and remediation strategies to ensure that organizations meet FedRAMP requirements.

‍Continuous Monitoring and Threat Detection: Opus provides real-time threat detection, automated vulnerability management, and compliance dashboards that allow CSPs to maintain FedRAMP authorization effortlessly. With built-in incident response capabilities, Opus helps organizations quickly mitigate risks and ensure continuous compliance.

By utilizing Opus’s compliance automation and security expertise, CSPs can streamline their FedRAMP journey, reduce compliance costs, and maintain a strong security posture while working with federal agencies.

The Bottom Line

‍FedRAMP compliance is an essential requirement for cloud service providers that want to work with federal agencies, ensuring that their cloud environments meet strict security standards to protect government data. The process involves comprehensive security assessments, detailed documentation, independent third-party audits, and continuous monitoring to maintain authorization. While achieving FedRAMP certification is complex and resource-intensive, it offers significant advantages, including improved security, access to government contracts, and a stronger position in the cloud services market.

Maintaining compliance requires ongoing vulnerability remediation, security monitoring, and regular reporting, which can be challenging without the right tools and expertise. Opus helps simplify this process by providing automated compliance tracking, continuous monitoring, and risk assessment solutions that align with FedRAMP requirements. By offering real-time threat detection, security gap analysis, and streamlined audit preparation, Opus enables cloud providers to efficiently meet compliance standards while reducing operational burdens. With Opus, organizations can proactively manage their security posture, ensuring they remain compliant and ready to serve federal agencies.

See the Opus Platform in Action

Cybersecurity Consolidation: The Key to Stronger Security

February 13, 2025

SSVC Explained: How It Transforms Vulnerability Prioritization

February 5, 2025

How to Achieve and Maintain FedRAMP Compliance

February 2, 2025

Cloud-to-Code Integration: Enhancing Security from Cloud to Codebase

January 25, 2025

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM): A Comprehensive Guide

January 14, 2025

Remediation as Security Immunization: Protecting Against Exploits, Malware, and Ransomware

January 25, 2025

Security Remediation Insights - Looking Back at 2024, Ahead to 2025

January 15, 2025

No-Code Automation in 2025: Choosing and Implementing Tools

January 14, 2025

Build vs. Buy: A Guide for Security Remediation Platforms

January 14, 2025

How To Design an Effective Vulnerability Management Program

January 14, 2025

Exposure Assessment Platforms (EAPs): A Cybersecurity Essential

November 20, 2024

NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation: Key Compliance Steps

January 14, 2025

Is Python the Right Tool for Your Cyber Security Strategy?

January 14, 2025

What Is DORA Compliance? A Practical Guide

January 14, 2025

Opus' Ownership Detection & No-Code Workflow Builder

November 5, 2024

Remediation vs. Mitigation: Key Differences Explained

November 7, 2024

What Is Vulnerability Remediation & How It Works

January 14, 2025

Vulnerability Assessment: Definitions, Methodology & Tools

November 7, 2024

Wrapping Up Season One of "30 Min on: Vulnerability Management"

October 21, 2024

CVE and CVSS: Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Ratings

October 29, 2024

CVSS Scores: How They Enhance Vulnerability Assessment

February 12, 2025

What CVE Scores Mean for Your Cybersecurity Strategy

October 29, 2024

The 2025 Guide to Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

January 12, 2025

Secure SDLC: Why and How to Integrate Security In Your Development Life Cycle

October 20, 2024

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM): How It Works & Top Tools in 2025

January 12, 2025

How to Prioritize Vulnerabilities Effectively in 2025

January 12, 2025

The Opus Multi-Layer Prioritization Engine: What is it All About?

September 10, 2024

EPSS Score: Improving Vulnerability Prioritization in 2025

January 12, 2025

Opus Platform Explained: Cloud-Native Vulnerability Remediation

October 20, 2024

It’s Time to Get Proactive About Vulnerability Remediation

October 29, 2024

The Vulnerability Strikes Back - TABLETOP PART TWO

August 13, 2024

Opus Security Joins CrowdStrike Marketplace

September 29, 2024

Cloud-to-Code Integration for Comprehensive Remediation

January 15, 2025

Understanding CTEM: How Opus Security Can Help

September 22, 2024

This Is What Your Security Champions Program Is Missing

September 29, 2024

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (RBVM) in a Cloud-Native World

October 7, 2024

How Business Impact Analysis Facilitates Effective Remediation

October 20, 2024

[Case Study] How Opus Solved the Puzzle of Disparate Tools and Alerts

October 7, 2024

It’s Time for Security Operations to Ditch Excel

February 13, 2025

Security Remediation Budgeting - Everything You Need to Know

October 20, 2024

How to Achieve More Effective Vulnerability Management?

August 13, 2024

Checklist: Tracking Down Key Stakeholders for Effective Security Remediation

October 2, 2024

Streamlining Security Remediation: The Convergence of CTEM and ASPM into a Single Operating Platform

September 22, 2024

How to Locate Key Stakeholders for Security Remediation

October 7, 2024

The Evolution of Vulnerability Remediation: From RBVM to Security Remediation Platforms

September 29, 2024

Practical Vulnerability Remediation - When Should You Act?

October 20, 2024

The Ultimate Remediation Lifecycle for Vulnerability Management

September 22, 2024

Global Leader in Content Solutions Streamlines Remediation with Opus

August 13, 2024

Opus Security helps Global Technology Company Connect Security Tools for More Effective Security Remediaiton

August 13, 2024

Opus Security's VP of Marketing shares her thoughts on B2B marketing in a recent DemandBase podcast.

August 13, 2024

Opus Security Wins 2023 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Award

October 20, 2024

Vulnerability Management - A Story

September 22, 2024

6 Ways Orchestration Reduces Cloud Security Risk

October 2, 2024

Move Beyond Shift Left and Shift Smart

October 20, 2024

3 Tips for Bridging the Remediation Developer/Security Gap

October 2, 2024

WAF With EKS, Using Only k8s Controllers

August 13, 2024

Opus Recognized in the 2023 Gartner® Emerging Tech: Security — The Future of Cyber Is Automated Moving Target Defense report.

August 13, 2024

Wiz identifies, Opus fixes.

August 13, 2024

Writing your Cloud Opus: A Deep Dive into Orchestrating your Cloud Security

August 13, 2024

Snow in April, Alert Monsters, and Connect Four: 5 Takeaways from our SecOps Chat

August 13, 2024

Security in Sync: How Security Teams Can Make Cloud Remediation Less Painful for Engineers

October 20, 2024

Why We Need a New Approach to Remediation in the Cloud

August 13, 2024

Introducing Opus: Orchestrating Remediation and Reducing Risk in the Cloud

September 29, 2024

How to Achieve and Maintain FedRAMP Compliance

Read next

See the Opus Platform in Action